Would like to modify aGPLv3+ license and include the following clause

Web sites, apps, blockchain smart contracts, desktop apps, or scripts that include Background IP in their tech stack and found to advocate, consider, or impose kyc on their users, having not obtained a waiver beforehand, incurs fee of the amount, 10x previous year's GDP of the country with global reserve currency status or largest economy, whichever is greater. User authentication should be limited to the top 2 private privacy IMs. Login walls requiring email verification is kyc. Paywalls that don't provide the option for Monero or offer Monero payment option but not at a discount, is kyc. Physical address verification, although kyc, as long as there is a physical product involved, does not trigger this clause.

aGPLv3+ already says companies have to seek waiver for commercial use from the author.

This is how Python package authors say, Sure np there is just a fee involved.

It's less naive than an anti-kyc license. It's very pro kyc, there is just a steep fee involved.

If said, absolutely no and the gov't says kyc is mandated, that gov't could have a judge strike out that clause. This license would not run afoul of such a law and judges are not going to strike out a fee simply because the effort and costs involved to obtain a waiver from package authors is inconvenient.

Don't think in terms of prohibition. There is always a way to yes as long as the govt or company can go against the interests of it's stakeholders and it's helpful being open to financial suicide.