you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's less naive than an anti-kyc license. It's very pro kyc, there is just a steep fee involved.

If said, absolutely no and the gov't says kyc is mandated, that gov't could have a judge strike out that clause. This license would not run afoul of such a law and judges are not going to strike out a fee simply because the effort and costs involved to obtain a waiver from package authors is inconvenient.

Don't think in terms of prohibition. There is always a way to yes as long as the govt or company can go against the interests of it's stakeholders and it's helpful being open to financial suicide.

  • source
  • parent