(TikTok screencap)

Photo of a portable surveillance system with the caption “I'd rather see crackheads at the gas station than this stupid overstimulating
surveillance state crap”
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Most stores are tenants of a landlord. Even those Walmart warehouses are leased, often both in land and structure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Even if they are tenants to a lease, the doctrine of quiet enjoyment would prohibit a landlord from being able to freely agree to having police property sitting on the store's parking lot if their lease covers the parking lot. It's kinda like renting a house with a yard: your lease is for the house and the yard surrounding the house. A landlord cannot just come on top the lawn and start ripping it up without the tenant's permission.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    A landlord cannot just come on top the lawn and start ripping it up without the tenant's permission.

    On one hand, yes. On the other hand that's only as enforceable as a tenant can fight it.

    In practice it happens. Unless the tenant has the resources or there's a legal advocacy group dedicated to that specific issue, owners tend to be able to do whatever they want so long as they use the argument of 'protecting my property'.

    The settlement and restitution just ends up something like the owner keeps their stuff there and maybe you get to terminate your lease tomorrow without being forced to pay out the whole eight remaining months of the lease. But that's anecdotal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    On one hand, yes. On the other hand that’s only as enforceable as a tenant can fight it.

    Trespass to land is a tort, which means there's the potential for monetary damages.

  • source
  • parent