Technology

technology@lemmy.world

89,597 readers

13,778 active

2,336 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

Nearly Half of Europeans Want X Banned if it Continues to Break the Law (peoplevsbig.tech)

submitted 8 months ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

117 comments fedilink hide all child comments

👏 4

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

ChatControl is pushed with the excuse of CSAM. If that was a true concern of the proponents, we would have a push towards stronger and faster enforcement of the DMA and in particular of X. Instead, nothing.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

I see. I have some doubts about the motivation of these people, too. But regulators are going after X.

Consider that the chatcontrol equivalent would be going after services that don't spy enough on their users.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

ChatControl would be going after all messages of all users by default. And CSAM is the excuse.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago

What I'm getting at is that these laws demand that companies should do the spying. Surveillance is expensive, so foisting on these foreign companies is politically the easiest solution.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent