It's the top comment on all the pop science articles. Can it just officially be a rule? You are all much smarter than I, please help compile a list of known websites that publish explicitly low quality articles, with very little science basis to back up said claims, beyond an extremely shoddy study.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm not that long here, but if it's not feasible to automatically detect the slopper-sites, maybe a rule could be introduced that people can report on?

This way the mod has an easier time identifying the things that are unwanted by the community.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    This was actually the solution I had in mind. Id be happy to report the articles, if there was an actual rule to point to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    I'd go so far as to blacklist individual sites based on a threshold upvote on the top negative post (can be automated), and give a mechanism to undo it, poll perhaps, if people care enough they'll protect. It will naturally tend to negative, but given 90%(+ these days) of everything is crap -Sturgeon's law - it should work out.

  • source
  • parent