you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 43 points 8 months ago (25 children)

Helium is a non-renewable substance which there is a global shortage of. I wonder how much it takes to lift that thing 😅

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 8 months ago (17 children)

    Wouldn't hydrogen be better for lifting something like a wind turbine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Not necessarily. It's not about the boom factor alone - hydrogen is a small atom, and so under pressure, most commonly used materials are permeable to it. It leaks through every material. It really takes something as solid as steel pipes for hydrogen atoms to not work their way through and escape. So while hydrogen would be cheaper to produce at scale, it's also constantly leaking out of any container.

    For wind turbines, static electricity and storms would be huge risks as well, so the application of a floating wind turbine would not be ideal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    If you're producing electricity in it, you can always bring some water up and use some of that electricity to extract hydrogen from the water to make up for any leaks.

    It really depends how bad the leaking is since that dictates how much weight of water is needed to be brought up and electricity must be used for hydrolysis.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 8 months ago* (8 children)

    Yes, but I think hydrogen likes to go bang 🧨💥

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    No worries, that only happens if there's a spark, like for instance some static electricity. Shouldn't be a problem here, surely this thing won't generate any of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

    "Skytanic" was a great episode of Archer. For anyone that hasn't seen it, the running gag is that Archer thinks the non-flammable helium is going to explode the blimp they're on leading to things like this slap

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, that's what the folks who designed the Hindenburg thought as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Helium may not be renewable but we can manufacture it from things like boron

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I need someone to explain the joke. Waiting 100,000 years for radioactive decay seems to be a bit boring as a punch line.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    It’s not a joke if you hit boron with a neutron it releases the energy in the form of an alpha particle which is just a helium atom.

    So take some boron-10 put it in a neutron flux and you get helium. This is being done in nearly every nuclear power plant in the world every second

  • source
  • parent