Kamala needed to adopt an anti genocide position to win the election. If you weren't advocating for that you weren't advocating to stop fascism. Simple as.

That's the issue you can't contend with, so you resort to ad hominems, claims of people being bots, etc. it's all to distract that you genuinely don't have an answer to the question if how Harris could have win the election if not for changing their position on this issue.

You can be mad and voters for voting against their interests. It's understandable and a valid criticism of voters. But what you can't do is claim that you didn't know that American voters can and will vote against their own interests. They did in 2016, clearly we both agree on that. They damn near voted against their own interests again in 2020, and if not for covid, Trump would have won that election. Relying on voters to simple vote better is political malpractice.

The strategy you are advocating for is that instead of the politician moving to a set of policies that their voters want and accept, we should rely on voters to simply "voter better". But we know Americans don't behave that way. We know you need to positively incentive American voters, especially Democrats, to show up.

The approach you are advocating for lost the 2016 and 2024 elections and handed the entire government to fascists.