There is a streamer, former army vet, who streams protest coverage under the handle "merc'

https://m.youtube.com/@MercadoMedia

Is it really goalpost moving for 'she never won' to be elaborated on, into 'she gave up before the voting even began because she was that unpopular'?

Does that really change the comparison between her and someone who came third and second in primaries? The essence of your retort was 'neither did Reagan but look at him', but the fact is that 'they both failed to win primaries', while technically correct, is definitely not equivalent to saying they were on equal standing. This is basically the exchange that just happened:

• "She obviously never won that scholarship, she never aced a test"
• "He didn't ace all his tests either, but he won the scholarship"
• "Yeah, but she had a D average and he had a B+ average"
• "Are the goalposts on wheels so they can be moved more easily?"

You've again attacked leftists while failing to address the fact thar Harris lost 6 million votes while running on the exact same platform as Biden..You again fail to understand that Kamala didn't lose because 6 million leftists felt she wasn't ideologically pure, she lost because 6 million people that voted for Clinton and Biden felt that she wasn't going to do anything to make their lives better, because the Democrats spent 4 years show they only cared about their wealthy donors. The average voter doesn't know shit other than how easy their life feels. And things have been hard for the past 5 years. The Democrats were saying everything was great and Trump was saying everything is awful and he would make it right. I think only the true believers actually took Trump at face value, but they could see that the Democrats had no intention of making their lives better so they sat it out. Voters only care about their own needs, and they know that the Democrats only care about their rich donors so they saw no reason to get out and vote. There are not 6 million electorial leftists in the US that sat out the election, it was 6 million apolitical workers who saw no reason to vote for either candidate that was going to make their lives worse.

And even if you are right and the Democrats abandoning all progressive policies the favor of gaining Cheney sympathetic Republicans lead to leftists not supporting Harris, doesn't that mean they made the wrong play regardless? Clearly the Democrats needed the left to win elections if that was the case, in which case telling their main voting block to go fuck themselves was a massive mistake. Almost as bad as telling 110,000 Muslims in swing state that they have to accept genocide against their fellow believers. And spoiler alert, Netanyahu started the action against Gaza because he knew Biden and the Democrats would support him. All Biden had to do was say he would cut all military aid and the genocide would have stopped the next day. But he wouldn't. And neither would his VP who ultimately lost the election. She was a Glass cliff candidate.

No matter how you slice it, the Democrats made the wrong play and demanding people fall in line and support atrocities and allowingbthe rich to get richer is the wrong move.

Edit: on top of that, the Democrats voted to give ICE billions more in funding last month. The Democrats support everything Trump is doing, they just wish he would do it quitly. If you still support the Democrats, then you support ICE, you support the US military actions in Venezuela and Iran, and you support the rich getting richer.

Also, Gerrymandering has nothing to do with presidental elections and the fact that Harris lost your state by a million votes. Please learn a single thing about how elections and political science works before responding to me again.