you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 8 months ago* (7 children)

"None of the photos of him dead look dead" isn't a great choice as your very first point if you're trying to make a compelling argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    I have added links. I'll add the other online account if I find it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago* (5 children)

    O...kay, you got any sources with even a shred of credibility? Because those are links to two random entertainers on youtube, a substack article (yay, nazi news platforms!) and an article that claims to have accessed epstein's FedEx account but doesn't provide even a screenshot as evidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    While his sources lack credibility, dismissing every substack as a "nazi news platform" is disingenuous

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago*

    No, not really. Substack is a blog hosting platform that pays it's subscribers - including straight up nazis. While there may be individual substack blogs with journalistic value (although I have never personally seen one) the platform itself is a problem, and much as with twitter, it is perfectly reasonable for me to be skeptical of the people that choose to remain on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I'm not chatGPT, I'm not going to do your work for you for free. Those videos show you URLs in the files or... Who am I kidding, you aren't going to do leg work, you're so incredibly intellectually lazy as to write off all of substack and YouTube. GL skid

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The only links in the descriptions for those videos are for Dr. G's course, which isn't a good look

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago

    Yeah lazy YouTube descriptions suck but the note in his cell is way too much work to parse and he did a good job. Especially with some of that handwriting. Very much worth watching if you're good at deciphering bad handwriting.

    Guard transcripts don't need the video you can read those.

  • source
  • parent