you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago (21 children)

No? It's the fault of all genders. Men perpetuate ideas that hurt other men, and women perpetuate ideas that hurt other women. Vice versa is equally true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    Im sure. So hard to hear men have it so uniquely rough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    No one is saying women don't have it rough. The difference is one gender is being pushed out of society, the other is being pushed under it. Men are basically encouraged to give up and go away, maybe commit suicide or go fight in a war. Women are encouraged to find a "man" and become some tradwife who has no agency. Neither is a good thing, but don't pretend they aren't different.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago* (18 children)

    Non heteronormative women are absolutely encouraged to die.

    5150 holds (local code, idk how local) are like a rite of passage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (11 children)

    What is a 5150 hold exactly and how is it relevant? It seems it's a California thing, and I don't live in or have ever visited Los Estados Unidos.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Right. 72 hour involuntary inpatient suicide hold

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    What does this have to do with gay women?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I think i already answered that, feel free to scroll up!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    No you didn't. You said they were a rite of passage which doesn't make sense. Are you capable of explaining what on earth your talking about?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (6 children)

    are you capable of

    Probably. Are you capable of figuring it out?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Are you trying to say that gay women get put on suicide holds for illegitimate reasons? If so why not just say that and stop being an ableist arsehole?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    I mean yeah, your being deliberately obtuse and rude for no reason, even though what you are talking about only applies to a certain geopolitical area. You're literally expecting me and everyone else to have knowledge of something even though there is not reason anyone outside the USA or California should know about it. You're also relying on implications, which isn't great when half the people on this site are autistic including yours truly. It's like if I expected you to know what a Pacer train is and what it implies about the state of rail transportation in northern england. Like what you don't live in England and have an interest in trains?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I used a regional term for a thing, that was an oops, the rest is there if you're willing to read in good faith.

    If you can't, there's no point talking to you. You're just looking for scraps to justify what you already think, or attack enemies.

    Why the fuck would i try to converse with that kind of determined ignorance? Nothing to be gained but frustration trying to weed out the half believed motivated pedantry your type always deploys. Sea lioning i think it's called.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sea lioning is when you relentlessly pursue someone for evidence. I am not asking for evidence, I am asking what you are talking about in the first place. How am I supposed to understand what you are talking about if you aren't willing to explain?

    I gave a quick look into it and it seems it has nothing to do with lesbians or women in general, but is a law effecting everyone that some facilities and police officers have abused in potentially illegal ways. If what I am reading is correct this is a serious problem, but has not much in particular to do with what you are talking about. From what I can see it's an issue to do with ableism, not homophobia or sexism. So you must clearly know something I don't, or are just trying to waste both of our time.

    Who do you think "my type" is exactly? Why do you think I have to be your enemy? You talk about engaging in good faith, while doing the exact opposite. All I asked is for an explanation, which would be simple and easy to do, and I may well even agree with whatever it is you are referring to. Instead you play mind games and try to be insulting. If you actually want to get people on your side this isn't how you do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    I hadn't considered that. I can't say I know much of the struggles of lesbians.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Also, heteronormative women are only valued for how they can, potentially, make more men. The platonic ideal is kept pregnant and comatose so it doesn't talk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Which is... I dunno, is that worse than 'be john henry (but tall) or simo hyha (but tall) or die trying'? I feel like it might be but both are far enough past the moral event horizon i cant say with confidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments