▲ 599 ▼ AI advice (lemmy.ml) submitted 8 months ago by Zerush@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 61 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 44 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (13 children) Tested on GPT-5 mini and it's real tho? Edit: Gemini gives different results permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 37 points 8 months ago (5 children) Man, I really hate how much they waffle. The only valid response is "You have to drive, because you need your car at the car wash in order to wash it". I don't need an explanation what kind of problem it is, nor a breakdown of the options. I don't need a bulletpoint list of arguments. I don't need pros and cons. And I definitely don't need a verdict. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago I'll also accept sarcasm. "Unless you've successfully trained your car to follow you like a loyal golden retriever, you're probably going to have to drive." permalink fedilink source parent [–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 7 points 8 months ago (1 child) Yeaaah they waffle a lot, i hate that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago You can actually fix this in the settings there's an option for permanent prompt tunings and you can add things like "focus on concise answers" or my favorite " i don't need to be glazed , I don't need to be told that it's an insightful question or reaches the heart of the matter. Just focus on answering the question" permalink fedilink source parent [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago It's the illusion of reason permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago I've found some success in ussing system prompts or similar to ignore explaining things lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml 13 points 8 months ago* (2 children) Those gemini responses are legitimately hilarious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago Yeah, Gemini is... interesting. It said it's a "one-way route" for the human. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 point 8 months ago Yeah, he yapped a lot for no reason but at least it make you giggle a little permalink fedilink source parent [–] VincentComfy@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago Gemini’s responses were surprisingly humorous permalink fedilink source parent [–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 4 points 8 months ago Bold of Gemini to imply any sort of liability for what it says. Google's lawyers really don't want that to be the case. permalink fedilink source parent [–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* Gemini got jokes, but why does it think walking emits zero carbons? Humans are carbon emitters, more so with exercise. Hell, I farted while giggling at its humor. Much less carbon than the car? Yep. Zero? Nope permalink fedilink source parent [–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* I used paid models which will be the only ones the LLM bros will care about. Even they kinda know not to glaze the free models. So not surprising ( I have to have the paid models for work, my lead developer is a LLM nut ) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 37 points 8 months ago (5 children) Man, I really hate how much they waffle. The only valid response is "You have to drive, because you need your car at the car wash in order to wash it". I don't need an explanation what kind of problem it is, nor a breakdown of the options. I don't need a bulletpoint list of arguments. I don't need pros and cons. And I definitely don't need a verdict. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago I'll also accept sarcasm. "Unless you've successfully trained your car to follow you like a loyal golden retriever, you're probably going to have to drive." permalink fedilink source parent [–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 7 points 8 months ago (1 child) Yeaaah they waffle a lot, i hate that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago You can actually fix this in the settings there's an option for permanent prompt tunings and you can add things like "focus on concise answers" or my favorite " i don't need to be glazed , I don't need to be told that it's an insightful question or reaches the heart of the matter. Just focus on answering the question" permalink fedilink source parent [–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago It's the illusion of reason permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago I've found some success in ussing system prompts or similar to ignore explaining things lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago I'll also accept sarcasm. "Unless you've successfully trained your car to follow you like a loyal golden retriever, you're probably going to have to drive." permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 7 points 8 months ago (1 child) Yeaaah they waffle a lot, i hate that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago You can actually fix this in the settings there's an option for permanent prompt tunings and you can add things like "focus on concise answers" or my favorite " i don't need to be glazed , I don't need to be told that it's an insightful question or reaches the heart of the matter. Just focus on answering the question" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago You can actually fix this in the settings there's an option for permanent prompt tunings and you can add things like "focus on concise answers" or my favorite " i don't need to be glazed , I don't need to be told that it's an insightful question or reaches the heart of the matter. Just focus on answering the question" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago It's the illusion of reason permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago I've found some success in ussing system prompts or similar to ignore explaining things lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml 13 points 8 months ago* (2 children) Those gemini responses are legitimately hilarious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago Yeah, Gemini is... interesting. It said it's a "one-way route" for the human. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 point 8 months ago Yeah, he yapped a lot for no reason but at least it make you giggle a little permalink fedilink source parent
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago Yeah, Gemini is... interesting. It said it's a "one-way route" for the human. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 point 8 months ago Yeah, he yapped a lot for no reason but at least it make you giggle a little permalink fedilink source parent
[–] VincentComfy@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago Gemini’s responses were surprisingly humorous permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 4 points 8 months ago Bold of Gemini to imply any sort of liability for what it says. Google's lawyers really don't want that to be the case. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* Gemini got jokes, but why does it think walking emits zero carbons? Humans are carbon emitters, more so with exercise. Hell, I farted while giggling at its humor. Much less carbon than the car? Yep. Zero? Nope permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* I used paid models which will be the only ones the LLM bros will care about. Even they kinda know not to glaze the free models. So not surprising ( I have to have the paid models for work, my lead developer is a LLM nut ) permalink fedilink source parent