you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 8 months ago (7 children)

This is why I say a much more interesting question is what came first, the chicken or the chicken egg?

It entirely depends on your definition of a chicken egg. Is a chicken egg an egg that hatches a chicken, or an egg that is laid by a chicken? If it is an egg that hatches a chicken then the chicken egg came first, but if it is an egg that is laid by a chicken then the chicken came first

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    If a chicken egg is an egg that hatches into a chicken, then unfertilized chicken eggs would not be chicken eggs. But if you took an alligator egg and transplanted a developing chicken embryo into it, that would become a chicken egg.
    You'd get the heuristic "All chickens have hatched from chicken eggs", which sounds pretty elegant.

    If a chicken egg is an egg laid by a chicken, then you couldn't reliably say that a chicken egg hatches into a chicken - the heuristic from before would become "Not all chickens have hatched from chicken eggs". And that one, while it feels a bit imprecise, might be closer to what we observe in reality, especially with that Proto-chicken argument. So the Proto-chicken would have laid a Proto-chicken egg, which hatched into a chicken, which laid chicken eggs.
    And it would work with the current scientific hijinks like hatching chickens from different eggs or straight from test tubes.

  • source
  • parent