Shouldn't the slopped distance be considered instead of the height?

(Sayonara Zetsubou Sensei: chapter 233)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Your equations are correct (although as I said in my other comment 9.81 is the global average but gravity varies by ~0.1 so that's too many significant figures), but their issue doesn't have to do with using sloped distance, by which I assume you mean the length of the slope (they don't as far as I can tell). It says the height change is 2 meters, and they use 2 meters as the distance since that's the component of the displacement parallel to gravity. The problem is that they didn't convert mass to weight.

work = average force • displacement = |average force| * |displacement| * cos(angle between them)
     = component of average force parallel to displacement * |displacement|
     = component of displacement parallel to force * |average force|

weight = force due to gravity = mass * acceleration due to gravity ≈ 5 kg * 9.8 m/s² = 49 N

work = component of displacement parallel to average force * |average force|
     = 2 m * weight
     ≈ 98 Nm
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments