432
disliking tech bros ≠ disliking tech (ani.social)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Not sure if this is the best community to post in; please let me know if there's a more appropriate one. AFAIK Aii@programming.dev is meant for news and articles only.

You hate AI because it is AI. I hate "AI" because it is peddled by snake oil salesman. We are not the same.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Machine Learning and the training and use of targeted, specialized inferential models is useful. LLMs and generative content models are not.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

    Let's not forget about traditional AI, which have served us well for so long that we stopped thinking of them as AI.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    What?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

    As in, I agree with your point. I just want to give a shoutout to the non-ML-based AI.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    In the strictest sense of the technical definition: all of what you are describing are algorithmic approaches that are only colloquially referred to as “AI”. Artificial Intelligence is still science fiction. “AI” as it’s being marketed and sold today is categorical snake oil. We are nowhere even close to having a Star Trek ship-wide computer with anything even approaching reliable, reproducible, and safe outputs and capabilities that are fit for purpose - much less anything even remotely akin to a Soong-type Android.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    In the strictest sense there is no technical definition because it all depends on what is "intelligence", which isn't something we have an easy definition for. A thermostat learning when you want which temperature based on usage stats can absolutely fulfill some definitions of intelligence (perceiving information and adapting behaviour as a result), and is orders of magnitude less complex than neural networks.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    What! LLMs are extremely useful. They can already:

    -Funnel wealth to the richest people -Create fake money to trade around -Deplete the world of natural resources -Make sure consumers cannot buy computer hardware -Poison the wells of online spaces with garbage content that takes 2s to generate and 2 minutes to read

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent