you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 8 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    Instead of the sound of a chainsaw, it's the sound of a 70x drive on the verge of exploding

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    I thought the disks would shatter if spun much above 42x ...

    But I was told that many moons ago so maybe my information is outdated. Or maybe it was just never accurate.

    Mulaney "Who's to say?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (5 children)

    I mean, I think technically the "x" is the read speed, and not necessarily indicative of what the maximum RPM is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Ah, I was always told that ##x was how many times faster than some classic model of cd drive the disk was spun.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I always thought listening to music was 1x = 76 minutes, so a 4x cd burner would burn a disc in like 4 minutes....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Based on a few things, we were both right. Primarily I'm going to reference this (which corroborates what you said, except it claims 74 minutes):

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_storage_media_writing_and_reading_speed

    Something called "Ask Leo" does say there's a high risk of a disk shattering when spun above 48x, which is apparently equivalent to 24000 RPM. However, I can't vouch for the credibility of this site any more than I can for the person who originally made that claim to me (except that I think it was my dad and he was usually pretty dependable).

    https://askleo.com/what_does_the_x_in_a_48x_speed_cdrom_mean/

    Apparently Mythbusters demonstrated that a disk will shatter at 30000 RPM but, as sometimes happens, their methodology was criticized. This, it seems, is because they spun the disk on a Dremel rather than in a more realistic environment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments