120
Israel used weapons in Gaza that made thousands of Palestinians evaporate (www.aljazeera.com)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/world
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 9 months ago (8 children)

What do you mean with giving control back to Palestinians? Should they take over the government of Israel and unify it with their current territory/government? What would happen with Israelis? You think those people will all of a sudden get along?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Who gives a fuck what happens to the Israelis.

    Do you also care for the plight of the Nazis who settled into the lands they genocided, after the war ended?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    I don't think that there is any sense in what people here are saying. You all know that what you are proposing won't stop the killing on either side. I guess you do this out of anger and I can understand that. But this won't solve anything.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (5 children)

    Israel no longer existing would stop the killing by Israel.

    It’s not a stance I think can be realistically achieved while western states back Israel and their genocide.

    It’s the stance I wish to see happen. I am powerless but that doesn’t mean I can’t want an ideal outcome.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    If this is your ideal outcome you are no better then the worst Israelis are

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Self defense is objectively better than aggressive genocide.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Eradicating another nation is not selfe defense it is literally the definition of genocide.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (1 child)

    That is literally not the definition of genocide. Eradicating nations is the goal of every anarchist.

    Genocide is eradicating peoples, of which no one is calling for here. You are the only one even hinting at that topic.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago

    You said Israel no longer existing would stop the killing from Israels Side. Now I do not see Israelis willingly giving up their country and leave. Eradicating the nation in the sense of nation state seems unlikely but even if this was done I don't think that it would get quieter in the region. If anything I would expect things to get worse. So judging from that I think that what you are proposing is a pipe dream but maybe I am not seeing what you mean exactly. Would you care to elaborate. Probably provide an actual plan. As a small disclaimer, I am fairly new to the fedivers and I did not know that this instance is tending to the ideas of anarchy. Also I am not very knowledged in anarchy, what is really ment by that (to me it means something similar to rulelessness).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent