▲ 757 ▼ stay woke (quokk.au) submitted 9 months ago by Deceptichum to c/peoplemastodon 76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (4 children) yhea, but which book? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago (3 children) The one that was linked. I know it’s not a book. I was using your own analogy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (2 children) are you aware what analogies are? you didn't link a book, but the whole library. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) Okay so then again. It doesn’t matter what book I choose as a source. They are all about what the post is about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago So cite which documents support the claim. If it’s so easy it shouldn’t be hard to do. You’re basically replying to a statement of that’s illegal and being asked to cite what is illegal by saying reference all of the legal caselaw. It may be technically correct but it’s useless. There is a reason academics and legal scholars say reference paragraph x of book y etc. if you can’t provide easy examples why would I buy your claim? Put up or shut up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago (3 children) The one that was linked. I know it’s not a book. I was using your own analogy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (2 children) are you aware what analogies are? you didn't link a book, but the whole library. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) Okay so then again. It doesn’t matter what book I choose as a source. They are all about what the post is about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago So cite which documents support the claim. If it’s so easy it shouldn’t be hard to do. You’re basically replying to a statement of that’s illegal and being asked to cite what is illegal by saying reference all of the legal caselaw. It may be technically correct but it’s useless. There is a reason academics and legal scholars say reference paragraph x of book y etc. if you can’t provide easy examples why would I buy your claim? Put up or shut up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (2 children) are you aware what analogies are? you didn't link a book, but the whole library. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) Okay so then again. It doesn’t matter what book I choose as a source. They are all about what the post is about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago So cite which documents support the claim. If it’s so easy it shouldn’t be hard to do. You’re basically replying to a statement of that’s illegal and being asked to cite what is illegal by saying reference all of the legal caselaw. It may be technically correct but it’s useless. There is a reason academics and legal scholars say reference paragraph x of book y etc. if you can’t provide easy examples why would I buy your claim? Put up or shut up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) Okay so then again. It doesn’t matter what book I choose as a source. They are all about what the post is about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago So cite which documents support the claim. If it’s so easy it shouldn’t be hard to do. You’re basically replying to a statement of that’s illegal and being asked to cite what is illegal by saying reference all of the legal caselaw. It may be technically correct but it’s useless. There is a reason academics and legal scholars say reference paragraph x of book y etc. if you can’t provide easy examples why would I buy your claim? Put up or shut up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 months ago So cite which documents support the claim. If it’s so easy it shouldn’t be hard to do. You’re basically replying to a statement of that’s illegal and being asked to cite what is illegal by saying reference all of the legal caselaw. It may be technically correct but it’s useless. There is a reason academics and legal scholars say reference paragraph x of book y etc. if you can’t provide easy examples why would I buy your claim? Put up or shut up. permalink fedilink source parent
