you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 months ago* (3 children)

How is "sex with children" sugarcoating it? That seems to be a literal interpretation of what's going on?

The other two I can understand as reductive language but this is just calling a spade a spade no? Is "sex with a child" not just as bad as "child abuse" or are there people who see that as a better way of phrasing it?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    The nuance is that “sex” requires consent, because sex without consent is rape. So sex with a non-consenting person (including all children) can’t exist, because it’s actually raping children.

    It’s more of a nitpicky difference than the others because I’d bet your average adult doesn’t bother thinking about that nuance, but it does carry a different subconscious weight. One is considered fun, happy, and almost everyone does it; the other is a monstrous act that has no justification.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments