▲ 78 ▼ Solarpunk (lemmy.zip) submitted 9 months ago by Salamence@lemmy.zip to c/memes@lemmy.ml 91 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago (22 children) In a concrete sense, yes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 22 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago (21 children) No it's not https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1872/10/authority.htm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (20 children) What appeals to you about that text? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (19 children) How authority is defined and how Engels actually logically provides an answer to the question whether organization without authority is possible permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -6 points 9 months ago (18 children) A short 'logical' essay can give any answer in an abstract sense, but that doesn't discount empirical examples. Always seemed to me like Engels begs the question, takes "anarchy = chaos" as a starting assumption. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago (17 children) Empirical examples... that you have not provided? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -6 points 9 months ago (16 children) It's trivially easy to think of examples of "organisation without authority" in nature, in history, in software. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (14 children) Provide a trivially easy example that you can think of (in the concrete sense) and let's examine it together permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -10 points 9 months ago (13 children) You provide one, you have a brain, you don't need me to spoonfeed you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (11 children) I provided you not only one, but two (cotton spinning wheel and railway example), assuming you're familiar with Engels text. I see you're either scared to be challenged ideologically or it's not as trivially easy as you make it seem to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -8 points 9 months ago (10 children) No, those aren't examples of "organisation without authority"; they're the opposite. I only see two possibilities – You need to spoonfeed you examples of "organisation without authority" because you have excessive respect for my opinion, lack of independent thought You're playing the role of 'hostile skeptic on the internet' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (9 children) No, those aren’t examples of “organisation without authority”; they’re the opposite. Brother in Christ if this is your reading comprehension I'm not sure how to help you. I'm arguing with Engels here: Meaning organization without authority isn't possible. How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it's not something I believe in dipshit? Provides no examples Ok bye permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children) How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it’s not something I believe in dipshit? "How the fuck do you expect me to use my brain when my beliefs are in the way?!?" I expected exactly this tbh. You even admit that it's your "beliefs" that blind you to the examples we see all around us. No point talking to a hostile deadminded Believer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children) Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it's trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago "Prove my point for me" permalink fedilink source parent [–] techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago Such as? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago (21 children) No it's not https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1872/10/authority.htm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (20 children) What appeals to you about that text? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (19 children) How authority is defined and how Engels actually logically provides an answer to the question whether organization without authority is possible permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -6 points 9 months ago (18 children) A short 'logical' essay can give any answer in an abstract sense, but that doesn't discount empirical examples. Always seemed to me like Engels begs the question, takes "anarchy = chaos" as a starting assumption. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago (17 children) Empirical examples... that you have not provided? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -6 points 9 months ago (16 children) It's trivially easy to think of examples of "organisation without authority" in nature, in history, in software. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (14 children) Provide a trivially easy example that you can think of (in the concrete sense) and let's examine it together permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -10 points 9 months ago (13 children) You provide one, you have a brain, you don't need me to spoonfeed you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (11 children) I provided you not only one, but two (cotton spinning wheel and railway example), assuming you're familiar with Engels text. I see you're either scared to be challenged ideologically or it's not as trivially easy as you make it seem to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -8 points 9 months ago (10 children) No, those aren't examples of "organisation without authority"; they're the opposite. I only see two possibilities – You need to spoonfeed you examples of "organisation without authority" because you have excessive respect for my opinion, lack of independent thought You're playing the role of 'hostile skeptic on the internet' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (9 children) No, those aren’t examples of “organisation without authority”; they’re the opposite. Brother in Christ if this is your reading comprehension I'm not sure how to help you. I'm arguing with Engels here: Meaning organization without authority isn't possible. How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it's not something I believe in dipshit? Provides no examples Ok bye permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children) How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it’s not something I believe in dipshit? "How the fuck do you expect me to use my brain when my beliefs are in the way?!?" I expected exactly this tbh. You even admit that it's your "beliefs" that blind you to the examples we see all around us. No point talking to a hostile deadminded Believer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children) Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it's trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago "Prove my point for me" permalink fedilink source parent [–] techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago Such as? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (20 children) What appeals to you about that text? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (19 children) How authority is defined and how Engels actually logically provides an answer to the question whether organization without authority is possible permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -6 points 9 months ago (18 children) A short 'logical' essay can give any answer in an abstract sense, but that doesn't discount empirical examples. Always seemed to me like Engels begs the question, takes "anarchy = chaos" as a starting assumption. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago (17 children) Empirical examples... that you have not provided? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -6 points 9 months ago (16 children) It's trivially easy to think of examples of "organisation without authority" in nature, in history, in software. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (14 children) Provide a trivially easy example that you can think of (in the concrete sense) and let's examine it together permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -10 points 9 months ago (13 children) You provide one, you have a brain, you don't need me to spoonfeed you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (11 children) I provided you not only one, but two (cotton spinning wheel and railway example), assuming you're familiar with Engels text. I see you're either scared to be challenged ideologically or it's not as trivially easy as you make it seem to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -8 points 9 months ago (10 children) No, those aren't examples of "organisation without authority"; they're the opposite. I only see two possibilities – You need to spoonfeed you examples of "organisation without authority" because you have excessive respect for my opinion, lack of independent thought You're playing the role of 'hostile skeptic on the internet' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (9 children) No, those aren’t examples of “organisation without authority”; they’re the opposite. Brother in Christ if this is your reading comprehension I'm not sure how to help you. I'm arguing with Engels here: Meaning organization without authority isn't possible. How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it's not something I believe in dipshit? Provides no examples Ok bye permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children) How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it’s not something I believe in dipshit? "How the fuck do you expect me to use my brain when my beliefs are in the way?!?" I expected exactly this tbh. You even admit that it's your "beliefs" that blind you to the examples we see all around us. No point talking to a hostile deadminded Believer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children) Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it's trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago "Prove my point for me" permalink fedilink source parent [–] techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago Such as? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (19 children) How authority is defined and how Engels actually logically provides an answer to the question whether organization without authority is possible permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -6 points 9 months ago (18 children) A short 'logical' essay can give any answer in an abstract sense, but that doesn't discount empirical examples. Always seemed to me like Engels begs the question, takes "anarchy = chaos" as a starting assumption. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago (17 children) Empirical examples... that you have not provided? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -6 points 9 months ago (16 children) It's trivially easy to think of examples of "organisation without authority" in nature, in history, in software. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (14 children) Provide a trivially easy example that you can think of (in the concrete sense) and let's examine it together permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -10 points 9 months ago (13 children) You provide one, you have a brain, you don't need me to spoonfeed you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (11 children) I provided you not only one, but two (cotton spinning wheel and railway example), assuming you're familiar with Engels text. I see you're either scared to be challenged ideologically or it's not as trivially easy as you make it seem to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -8 points 9 months ago (10 children) No, those aren't examples of "organisation without authority"; they're the opposite. I only see two possibilities – You need to spoonfeed you examples of "organisation without authority" because you have excessive respect for my opinion, lack of independent thought You're playing the role of 'hostile skeptic on the internet' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (9 children) No, those aren’t examples of “organisation without authority”; they’re the opposite. Brother in Christ if this is your reading comprehension I'm not sure how to help you. I'm arguing with Engels here: Meaning organization without authority isn't possible. How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it's not something I believe in dipshit? Provides no examples Ok bye permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children) How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it’s not something I believe in dipshit? "How the fuck do you expect me to use my brain when my beliefs are in the way?!?" I expected exactly this tbh. You even admit that it's your "beliefs" that blind you to the examples we see all around us. No point talking to a hostile deadminded Believer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children) Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it's trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago "Prove my point for me" permalink fedilink source parent [–] techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago Such as? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -6 points 9 months ago (18 children) A short 'logical' essay can give any answer in an abstract sense, but that doesn't discount empirical examples. Always seemed to me like Engels begs the question, takes "anarchy = chaos" as a starting assumption. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago (17 children) Empirical examples... that you have not provided? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -6 points 9 months ago (16 children) It's trivially easy to think of examples of "organisation without authority" in nature, in history, in software. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (14 children) Provide a trivially easy example that you can think of (in the concrete sense) and let's examine it together permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -10 points 9 months ago (13 children) You provide one, you have a brain, you don't need me to spoonfeed you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (11 children) I provided you not only one, but two (cotton spinning wheel and railway example), assuming you're familiar with Engels text. I see you're either scared to be challenged ideologically or it's not as trivially easy as you make it seem to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -8 points 9 months ago (10 children) No, those aren't examples of "organisation without authority"; they're the opposite. I only see two possibilities – You need to spoonfeed you examples of "organisation without authority" because you have excessive respect for my opinion, lack of independent thought You're playing the role of 'hostile skeptic on the internet' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (9 children) No, those aren’t examples of “organisation without authority”; they’re the opposite. Brother in Christ if this is your reading comprehension I'm not sure how to help you. I'm arguing with Engels here: Meaning organization without authority isn't possible. How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it's not something I believe in dipshit? Provides no examples Ok bye permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children) How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it’s not something I believe in dipshit? "How the fuck do you expect me to use my brain when my beliefs are in the way?!?" I expected exactly this tbh. You even admit that it's your "beliefs" that blind you to the examples we see all around us. No point talking to a hostile deadminded Believer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children) Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it's trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago "Prove my point for me" permalink fedilink source parent [–] techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago Such as? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago (17 children) Empirical examples... that you have not provided? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -6 points 9 months ago (16 children) It's trivially easy to think of examples of "organisation without authority" in nature, in history, in software. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (14 children) Provide a trivially easy example that you can think of (in the concrete sense) and let's examine it together permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -10 points 9 months ago (13 children) You provide one, you have a brain, you don't need me to spoonfeed you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (11 children) I provided you not only one, but two (cotton spinning wheel and railway example), assuming you're familiar with Engels text. I see you're either scared to be challenged ideologically or it's not as trivially easy as you make it seem to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -8 points 9 months ago (10 children) No, those aren't examples of "organisation without authority"; they're the opposite. I only see two possibilities – You need to spoonfeed you examples of "organisation without authority" because you have excessive respect for my opinion, lack of independent thought You're playing the role of 'hostile skeptic on the internet' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (9 children) No, those aren’t examples of “organisation without authority”; they’re the opposite. Brother in Christ if this is your reading comprehension I'm not sure how to help you. I'm arguing with Engels here: Meaning organization without authority isn't possible. How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it's not something I believe in dipshit? Provides no examples Ok bye permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children) How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it’s not something I believe in dipshit? "How the fuck do you expect me to use my brain when my beliefs are in the way?!?" I expected exactly this tbh. You even admit that it's your "beliefs" that blind you to the examples we see all around us. No point talking to a hostile deadminded Believer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children) Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it's trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago "Prove my point for me" permalink fedilink source parent [–] techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago Such as? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -6 points 9 months ago (16 children) It's trivially easy to think of examples of "organisation without authority" in nature, in history, in software. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (14 children) Provide a trivially easy example that you can think of (in the concrete sense) and let's examine it together permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -10 points 9 months ago (13 children) You provide one, you have a brain, you don't need me to spoonfeed you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (11 children) I provided you not only one, but two (cotton spinning wheel and railway example), assuming you're familiar with Engels text. I see you're either scared to be challenged ideologically or it's not as trivially easy as you make it seem to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -8 points 9 months ago (10 children) No, those aren't examples of "organisation without authority"; they're the opposite. I only see two possibilities – You need to spoonfeed you examples of "organisation without authority" because you have excessive respect for my opinion, lack of independent thought You're playing the role of 'hostile skeptic on the internet' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (9 children) No, those aren’t examples of “organisation without authority”; they’re the opposite. Brother in Christ if this is your reading comprehension I'm not sure how to help you. I'm arguing with Engels here: Meaning organization without authority isn't possible. How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it's not something I believe in dipshit? Provides no examples Ok bye permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children) How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it’s not something I believe in dipshit? "How the fuck do you expect me to use my brain when my beliefs are in the way?!?" I expected exactly this tbh. You even admit that it's your "beliefs" that blind you to the examples we see all around us. No point talking to a hostile deadminded Believer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children) Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it's trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago "Prove my point for me" permalink fedilink source parent [–] techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago Such as? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (14 children) Provide a trivially easy example that you can think of (in the concrete sense) and let's examine it together permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -10 points 9 months ago (13 children) You provide one, you have a brain, you don't need me to spoonfeed you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (11 children) I provided you not only one, but two (cotton spinning wheel and railway example), assuming you're familiar with Engels text. I see you're either scared to be challenged ideologically or it's not as trivially easy as you make it seem to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -8 points 9 months ago (10 children) No, those aren't examples of "organisation without authority"; they're the opposite. I only see two possibilities – You need to spoonfeed you examples of "organisation without authority" because you have excessive respect for my opinion, lack of independent thought You're playing the role of 'hostile skeptic on the internet' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (9 children) No, those aren’t examples of “organisation without authority”; they’re the opposite. Brother in Christ if this is your reading comprehension I'm not sure how to help you. I'm arguing with Engels here: Meaning organization without authority isn't possible. How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it's not something I believe in dipshit? Provides no examples Ok bye permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children) How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it’s not something I believe in dipshit? "How the fuck do you expect me to use my brain when my beliefs are in the way?!?" I expected exactly this tbh. You even admit that it's your "beliefs" that blind you to the examples we see all around us. No point talking to a hostile deadminded Believer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children) Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it's trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago "Prove my point for me" permalink fedilink source parent
[+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -10 points 9 months ago (13 children) You provide one, you have a brain, you don't need me to spoonfeed you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (11 children) I provided you not only one, but two (cotton spinning wheel and railway example), assuming you're familiar with Engels text. I see you're either scared to be challenged ideologically or it's not as trivially easy as you make it seem to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -8 points 9 months ago (10 children) No, those aren't examples of "organisation without authority"; they're the opposite. I only see two possibilities – You need to spoonfeed you examples of "organisation without authority" because you have excessive respect for my opinion, lack of independent thought You're playing the role of 'hostile skeptic on the internet' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (9 children) No, those aren’t examples of “organisation without authority”; they’re the opposite. Brother in Christ if this is your reading comprehension I'm not sure how to help you. I'm arguing with Engels here: Meaning organization without authority isn't possible. How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it's not something I believe in dipshit? Provides no examples Ok bye permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children) How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it’s not something I believe in dipshit? "How the fuck do you expect me to use my brain when my beliefs are in the way?!?" I expected exactly this tbh. You even admit that it's your "beliefs" that blind you to the examples we see all around us. No point talking to a hostile deadminded Believer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children) Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it's trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago "Prove my point for me" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (11 children) I provided you not only one, but two (cotton spinning wheel and railway example), assuming you're familiar with Engels text. I see you're either scared to be challenged ideologically or it's not as trivially easy as you make it seem to be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -8 points 9 months ago (10 children) No, those aren't examples of "organisation without authority"; they're the opposite. I only see two possibilities – You need to spoonfeed you examples of "organisation without authority" because you have excessive respect for my opinion, lack of independent thought You're playing the role of 'hostile skeptic on the internet' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (9 children) No, those aren’t examples of “organisation without authority”; they’re the opposite. Brother in Christ if this is your reading comprehension I'm not sure how to help you. I'm arguing with Engels here: Meaning organization without authority isn't possible. How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it's not something I believe in dipshit? Provides no examples Ok bye permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children) How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it’s not something I believe in dipshit? "How the fuck do you expect me to use my brain when my beliefs are in the way?!?" I expected exactly this tbh. You even admit that it's your "beliefs" that blind you to the examples we see all around us. No point talking to a hostile deadminded Believer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children) Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it's trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -8 points 9 months ago (10 children) No, those aren't examples of "organisation without authority"; they're the opposite. I only see two possibilities – You need to spoonfeed you examples of "organisation without authority" because you have excessive respect for my opinion, lack of independent thought You're playing the role of 'hostile skeptic on the internet' permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (9 children) No, those aren’t examples of “organisation without authority”; they’re the opposite. Brother in Christ if this is your reading comprehension I'm not sure how to help you. I'm arguing with Engels here: Meaning organization without authority isn't possible. How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it's not something I believe in dipshit? Provides no examples Ok bye permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children) How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it’s not something I believe in dipshit? "How the fuck do you expect me to use my brain when my beliefs are in the way?!?" I expected exactly this tbh. You even admit that it's your "beliefs" that blind you to the examples we see all around us. No point talking to a hostile deadminded Believer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children) Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it's trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (9 children) No, those aren’t examples of “organisation without authority”; they’re the opposite. Brother in Christ if this is your reading comprehension I'm not sure how to help you. I'm arguing with Engels here: Meaning organization without authority isn't possible. How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it's not something I believe in dipshit? Provides no examples Ok bye permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children) How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it’s not something I believe in dipshit? "How the fuck do you expect me to use my brain when my beliefs are in the way?!?" I expected exactly this tbh. You even admit that it's your "beliefs" that blind you to the examples we see all around us. No point talking to a hostile deadminded Believer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children) Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it's trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children) How the fuck do you expect me to provide an example of organization without authority if it’s not something I believe in dipshit? "How the fuck do you expect me to use my brain when my beliefs are in the way?!?" I expected exactly this tbh. You even admit that it's your "beliefs" that blind you to the examples we see all around us. No point talking to a hostile deadminded Believer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children) Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it's trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children) Im too afraid to make my own argument and will claim it's trivially easy to do so. You make my argument for me instead permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) I don't have any ownership of the point, it's not mine, it's common-sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (5 children) If it's common sense and trivially easy to understand why can't you just explain it to us? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Youse have already answered that: because Beliefs stop you from seeing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (3 children) Sounds like it's not trivially easy to understand OR common sense. It sounds more like your beliefs prevent you from engaging in good faith. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (2 children) Got it, thanks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whiskers165@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago (1 child) You're welcome! Also gotta say your performance in this thread was like watching a 13 year old squirm getting caught lying about their report card. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) Don't see how you got that. I would rather not spend my time on 'please argue with me on the internet' people, especially when their starting point is mental incapacity ("I am unable to think of [easy to think of thing]!"). That's all I have said. Why would I wish to argue with them? Hope you're having a great day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago "Prove my point for me" permalink fedilink source parent
