you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 months ago (4 children)

No? You haven't presented any evidence whatsoever. If you actually posted evidence, or meaningfully contested the evidence I presented without making up conspiracy theories, then we could have a discussion. It isn't true because I link it or false because you do, I'm the only one presenting evidence while you've ignored it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    you are just quoting propaganda. repeatedly. and claiming it's evidence.

    then when i claim something as evidence, you claim it's propaganda, not evidence.

    and around and around we go.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    No? I cited a broad variety of academic scholarship and primary sources, you never linked any sources to begin with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    No no, see, they did make a bunch of claims as evidence. They may not have provided any sources for those claims and haven't proven those claims true. But they did provide a lot of claims and say that it is evidence of something.

    That we require it to be more rigorous than that is not their problem

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment