โฒ 343 โผ Piefed monthly user activity has increased by nearly 500 in 3 days. (piefed.fediverse.observer) submitted 9 months ago by Skavau@piefed.social to c/fediverse@lemmy.world 163 comments fedilink hide all child comments ๐ 3 ๐คฉ 1 Just thought I'd note this. Main beneficiary so far seems to be piefed.ca.
[โ] JamieDub86@piefed.social 14 points 9 months ago (11 children) Reddit also upped the enshittification but i cant remember why. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [โ] cinoreus@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (3 children) Ipo permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] JamieDub86@piefed.social 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) That was the big one, but there was something else smaller last year. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] cinoreus@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) What? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] JamieDub86@piefed.social 1 point 9 months ago There was something else that happened last autumn/winter that made it even shittier. Cant remember any info and its doing my head in. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] SirHaxalot@nord.red 8 points 9 months ago (5 children) I saw it in a post about people getting temp bans for simply stating that EU allies would be right to defend Greenland in case of military action. Might just have been one of several grievances with Reddit at the moment though permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [โ] WonderRin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) Woah, I haven't heard about this. Are those temp bans on specific subreddits or a site-wide ban for not being pro-Trump? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] SirHaxalot@nord.red 5 points 9 months ago (3 children) It was 3 day site wide bans as I understood it. Reason given was that saying that Greenland should defend itself was "threatening violence". The thread in question, thing it is in r/Sweden https://www.reddit.com/r/sweden/s/BvEiqSM2cf permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] WonderRin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago* (1 child) I'm probably applying too much logic here which Reddit admins don't seem to like, but... how can defending oneself if something happens (not even preemptively, but after the fact) be threatening violence, while Trump repeatedly saying they're gonna own Greenland one way or another is not threatening violence? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago theres also other easy ways apparently to get banned too, "reporting people if the mods dont agree you can get permantly banned yourself". or your comments are too spammy or to similar to bots. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 9 months ago then the 3 day sitewide bans end often leads to a shadow ban or sitewide ban, for unkown reasons for your part. as soon as they sniff other accounts you mave or deleted you are toast. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago its also too easy to get banned. new accounts and old inactive accounts becoming suddenly active are highly likely to get banned. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] cinoreus@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (3 children) Ipo permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] JamieDub86@piefed.social 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) That was the big one, but there was something else smaller last year. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] cinoreus@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) What? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] JamieDub86@piefed.social 1 point 9 months ago There was something else that happened last autumn/winter that made it even shittier. Cant remember any info and its doing my head in. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] JamieDub86@piefed.social 1 point 9 months ago (2 children) That was the big one, but there was something else smaller last year. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] cinoreus@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) What? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] JamieDub86@piefed.social 1 point 9 months ago There was something else that happened last autumn/winter that made it even shittier. Cant remember any info and its doing my head in. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] cinoreus@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) What? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] JamieDub86@piefed.social 1 point 9 months ago There was something else that happened last autumn/winter that made it even shittier. Cant remember any info and its doing my head in. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] JamieDub86@piefed.social 1 point 9 months ago There was something else that happened last autumn/winter that made it even shittier. Cant remember any info and its doing my head in. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] SirHaxalot@nord.red 8 points 9 months ago (5 children) I saw it in a post about people getting temp bans for simply stating that EU allies would be right to defend Greenland in case of military action. Might just have been one of several grievances with Reddit at the moment though permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [โ] WonderRin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) Woah, I haven't heard about this. Are those temp bans on specific subreddits or a site-wide ban for not being pro-Trump? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] SirHaxalot@nord.red 5 points 9 months ago (3 children) It was 3 day site wide bans as I understood it. Reason given was that saying that Greenland should defend itself was "threatening violence". The thread in question, thing it is in r/Sweden https://www.reddit.com/r/sweden/s/BvEiqSM2cf permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] WonderRin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago* (1 child) I'm probably applying too much logic here which Reddit admins don't seem to like, but... how can defending oneself if something happens (not even preemptively, but after the fact) be threatening violence, while Trump repeatedly saying they're gonna own Greenland one way or another is not threatening violence? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago theres also other easy ways apparently to get banned too, "reporting people if the mods dont agree you can get permantly banned yourself". or your comments are too spammy or to similar to bots. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 9 months ago then the 3 day sitewide bans end often leads to a shadow ban or sitewide ban, for unkown reasons for your part. as soon as they sniff other accounts you mave or deleted you are toast. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] WonderRin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) Woah, I haven't heard about this. Are those temp bans on specific subreddits or a site-wide ban for not being pro-Trump? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] SirHaxalot@nord.red 5 points 9 months ago (3 children) It was 3 day site wide bans as I understood it. Reason given was that saying that Greenland should defend itself was "threatening violence". The thread in question, thing it is in r/Sweden https://www.reddit.com/r/sweden/s/BvEiqSM2cf permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] WonderRin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago* (1 child) I'm probably applying too much logic here which Reddit admins don't seem to like, but... how can defending oneself if something happens (not even preemptively, but after the fact) be threatening violence, while Trump repeatedly saying they're gonna own Greenland one way or another is not threatening violence? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago theres also other easy ways apparently to get banned too, "reporting people if the mods dont agree you can get permantly banned yourself". or your comments are too spammy or to similar to bots. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 9 months ago then the 3 day sitewide bans end often leads to a shadow ban or sitewide ban, for unkown reasons for your part. as soon as they sniff other accounts you mave or deleted you are toast. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] SirHaxalot@nord.red 5 points 9 months ago (3 children) It was 3 day site wide bans as I understood it. Reason given was that saying that Greenland should defend itself was "threatening violence". The thread in question, thing it is in r/Sweden https://www.reddit.com/r/sweden/s/BvEiqSM2cf permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] WonderRin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago* (1 child) I'm probably applying too much logic here which Reddit admins don't seem to like, but... how can defending oneself if something happens (not even preemptively, but after the fact) be threatening violence, while Trump repeatedly saying they're gonna own Greenland one way or another is not threatening violence? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago theres also other easy ways apparently to get banned too, "reporting people if the mods dont agree you can get permantly banned yourself". or your comments are too spammy or to similar to bots. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 9 months ago then the 3 day sitewide bans end often leads to a shadow ban or sitewide ban, for unkown reasons for your part. as soon as they sniff other accounts you mave or deleted you are toast. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] WonderRin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago* (1 child) I'm probably applying too much logic here which Reddit admins don't seem to like, but... how can defending oneself if something happens (not even preemptively, but after the fact) be threatening violence, while Trump repeatedly saying they're gonna own Greenland one way or another is not threatening violence? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago theres also other easy ways apparently to get banned too, "reporting people if the mods dont agree you can get permantly banned yourself". or your comments are too spammy or to similar to bots. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago theres also other easy ways apparently to get banned too, "reporting people if the mods dont agree you can get permantly banned yourself". or your comments are too spammy or to similar to bots. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 9 months ago then the 3 day sitewide bans end often leads to a shadow ban or sitewide ban, for unkown reasons for your part. as soon as they sniff other accounts you mave or deleted you are toast. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago its also too easy to get banned. new accounts and old inactive accounts becoming suddenly active are highly likely to get banned. permalink fedilink source parent