That wasn't because of unit conversions, that was a major failure of systems management.
I say this as someone in IT where we have multiple other involved people verifying work we do. Mistakes happen, so you have external validations. I'm not even permitted to touch the systems for which I'm responsible - I have to document changes, with extensive lab testing that is vetted by someone who's never seen these systems.
NASA should be shamed for dropping the ball so badly.
Are those are the only two cases you can come up with, compared to the trillions it would take to convert, and the billions of errors that would occur with trying to convert now.
Just look at a single machine shop, that's using lathes from 1945 (because that's all they need for accuracy). Should they upgrade their lathes to new ones with metric indicators? How much steel is it going to take, coal, aluminum, energy just to transport the lathe to that one shop.
Then all their tools. The world doesn't have the manufacturing capability just to make measurement tools for all the industries that would need it.
And then you'd still have the conversion problem between one business and the next during the decade's long transition. How many conversion mistakes do you think would happen then?
You people who scream about this all the time have never had to even look at what it would take. You act like it's a simple problem.
Edit: Are you even aware they never put units on the numbers they use? How fucking amateur is that? Just assuming the values are one system or another, when multiple vendors use different systems? Imagine Ford not indicating that engine block bolts are metric, or torque values are in ft/lbs vs in/lbs vs newtons.
No, there's no fucking excuse - total amateur hour that wasted millions of dollars.