you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

You're reading words on a screen either way.

Who do you think is a better source:

  1. An unverified, inaccurate, low effort, and low quality idiot 😁
  2. or Britannica?

Unless you mean something else that I'm not receiving.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I appreciate that you seem to think that my brain is any better than that an low-effort and low quality idiot but it's not.

    The neurotransmitter person gave a quite confident account about the nature of attention and nature of human psychology. They clearly felt it was relevant to the point I was making. Surely someone like this has an university level degree in the subject and isn't just a random computer nerd who occasionally consumes some pop-science content online. It makes more sense to me to dip into their reservoir of knowledge instead of making a feeble attempt at reading some AI Summary on the topic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment