you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I mean slashes / instead of colons .

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    That’s not a colon. Both are commonly in use in Europe. USA just switched the d/m

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Is it really switching if that was the way it was traditionally done and they just kept doing it that way?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I think it was primarily a verbal ordering, that later became commonplace written down in the US. If it was written down in that order elsewhere, it would have been with the full text, ie. “July 4th, 1776”. Never something like “07/04/1776”, which I believe was an American invention.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    But wouldn't that just be an extension of the way of doing things, though? If I'm used to writing "July 4th, 1776", I wouldn't start writing "04/07/1776" when that format picked up (which, as I understand things, didn't really become a widespread norm until computers).

    Unless I'm misunderstanding you, of course (always possible).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think written abbreviated it was always eg. 4 Jul 1776, 4.7.1776 in Europe (UK/France/Germany)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I'm not sure that's quite true; here's an example from King George III doing it the way America does it now (top right corner of the top page):

    And an example from America in the same century (though I think we're already in agreement, there):

  • source
  • parent