you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 21 points 9 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 27 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    It doesn't?

    Its very clearly saying ugliness isn't a physical thing but a state of being.

    I assumed it meant being mean, rude, negative in a harmful way then that's what being ugly is. Meanwhile, someone who doesn't have traditional markers of beauty who are also positive things like kind and uplifting, then they are lovely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 10 points 9 months ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Did you not read the second paragraph?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, the second expands on which kind of "ugliness" the first is talking about.

    🤔 1
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    It says that even if you have conventionally ugly features, having good thoughts will still show on your face and people will notice. The inverse is that regardless of physical features having ugly thoughts will show on your face regardless of physical features and people will notice.

    It's okay to say that you didn't get the comic. You can agree or disagree but saying that the comic states that physically ugly people have ugly thoughts is wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)