samus12345 comments on Immersion ruined because of black people? 🙄

People Twitter

10,578 readers

4,631 active

19 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician

https://www.sotwe.com/
https://twitterviewer.net/Note: Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.

If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago

moderators

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The second one. The boat is meant to represent a dragon, just without the appendages, and the second one is where its back legs would be. Could also have a pair for up front, I suppose.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 child)

That begs the question if pants are a "back legs only, not front legs", or "legs only, not arms".

Taking it to the extreme, would pants for a centipede look more like a tube with "sleeves" all along it or just like a tiny pair of normal (to us) pants?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

This was under the assumption that it's a 4 legged dragon. If the theoretical front appendages are arms, no pants up front. Although thinking about it again, with no junk to protect, front pants are kinda useless, so maybe don't bother with them at all.

I'd say for any animal with multiple legs that are very close together, no pants at all would be best. At that point they'd be more of a hindrance than a help!

permalink

fedilink

source

parent