89
Is getting a 4060 prebuilt in 2026 a bad idea? (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/pcmasterrace@lemmy.world
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm looking at this deal for a prebuilt:

Lenovo LOQ 17IRR9 Tower PC — $749.99

  • Intel Core i5-14400F (10 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.7GHz)
  • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (8GB GDDR6)
  • RAM 16GB DDR5
  • 512GB SSD
  • PSU 500W

For some context, my PC has a 1070 in it. I'm a budget conscious gamer, usually playing at 1080p. With ram prices skyrocketing and steam betting on steam machines with low vram going forwards, I feel like it's an okay deal for a guy who upgrades basically never.

It seems like a nice deal to me. Anyone want to talk me out of it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 9 months ago* (4 children)

I feel like this is not a great deal. Keep in mind that pre-builts are in general, a gamble. They often advertise the parts that people might know (CPU/GPU) but fill the other parts (PSU, MoBo, RAM, computer case, fans, CPU cooler) with cheap garbage.

Now this PC is $250 short of $1000 (before tax and shipping) and you are getting a low end CPU from an old Intel generation, a mid/low end GPU from a prior generation (only +50% performance compared to the 1070), half the ram capacity you'd want, and absolutely terrible hard drive space at only 512 gb.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    I don't understand how providing the average performance gain over the 1070 is disingenuous/lying. In fact it would be more disingenuous to cherry pick certain games where the performance gains are highest.

    The 4060 is not a ray tracing card. Don't sip the Nvidia koolaid, you gonna need a vram buffer greater than 8 gb to run ray tracing at a frame rate that doesn't feel bad. Also ray tracing is a gimmick imo. I don't really think the visual enhancement is worth the performance hit in almost all games I've tried ray tracing. I'd rather play a game at 144 fps at native resolution than at 60 fps with ray tracing on and DLSS on.

    DLSS is a fair point imo, but personally, it would feel bad upgrading a decade old card with a 3 year old card; while getting the same vram capacity, an average +50% raster performance, and DLSS.

    Either way, this person's needs are different from mine, so may be that feels okay for them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    load more comments (1 reply)