MotoAsh comments on ELI5 How is this legal? Doesn't the constitution give us the right to tell them piss off?

Explain Like I'm Five

22,759 readers

281 active

0 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

Be respectful and inclusive.
No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
Engage in constructive discussions.
Share relevant content.
Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Use appropriate language and tone.
Report violations.
Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 3 years ago

moderators

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 1 point 9 months ago* (2 children)

This is a question of what happens during an attack. Not who is more likely to attack. For a bear, bear mace is an excellent choice. For ICE, if you already have a fucking gun, it being loaded is a first fucking step to that gun being useful at all.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

is a first fucking step to that gun being useful at all.

Except you are not talking about the use he had in mind for the gun. There can be more than one use for a thing. As an example, here's a very useful car:

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 1 point 9 months ago*

Except that sign isn't sitting on a road. Walking around an area where bullets might fly with an empty gun is equivalent to sitting on the road with a car out of gas.

I don't care if you are holding a sign that says, "I should've gone electric!" while you're sitting there with your car out of gas... If you did it on purpose, that is stupid.

Again: Useless.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent