Invoking Vaclav Havel, he said it was time to stop pretending that what the western powers called a rules-based order was not a self-serving sham.

“Great powers can afford, for now, to go it alone. They have the market size, the military capacity and the leverage to dictate terms. Middle powers do not. But when we only negotiate bilaterally with a hegemon, we negotiate from weakness. We accept what’s offered. We compete with each other to be the most accommodating,” he said

“Being a happy vassal is one thing, being a miserable slave is something else,” he said.

“If you back down now, you’re going to lose your dignity, and that’s probably the most precious thing you can have in a democracy, it’s your dignity.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 months ago (6 children)

I think you've got your adjectives pretty crazily backward about academia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (5 children)

    That's probably a matter of ignorance on your part. LLMs for example were innovated in academia, the world wide web was invented at CERN, I could literally go on for paragraphs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

    I ran a research lab in a university for 15+ years. I guarantee there's no money in it.

    Companies pay pennies on the dollar to research groups to solve problems with undergrads, grad students, and a bit of project manager time and to stay afloat, you have to over-buy projects as favors and to get publications. It is not unusual to run 7 or 8 projects at a time all on shoestring budgets in the lab. With a PhD I never broke 100k.

    Maybe there's some money in the business school, but nobody is getting rich quick for no work in academia.

    Edit: reducing the wall of text

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (3 children)

    Uhh... I think some wires got crossed here, because my point was that academics do the innovative work without financial incentive to do so, and that the industry profits off of that work.

    edit: I am stupid, you're right, my adjectives were backwards... sorry about that 🤦

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    Aha I will modify my last in that case. No harm no foul, but it's got a little more background in it than necessary if you weren't doubling down lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments