▲ 85 ▼ What's it like for you? (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone) submitted 9 months ago by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/ausomememes@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 comments fedilink hide all child comments Cross-posted from "What's it like for you?" by @LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone in !autism@lemmy.world
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children) I mean, fair, but also, it's just a meme :) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] misk@piefed.social 3 points 9 months ago (2 children) I love humour so much that it pains me when it’s used to misinform. Maybe it’s an accumulated grudge because I see how some of my friends share memes that are very relatable but are insidiously misleading in a way that either strokes ego or benefits capital in some way. I genuinely think autistic people are „better” at things I care about but it doesn’t make them inherently ethical. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child) Hm, I'm not sure Golden Retrievers are inherently ethical either. I do think ASD peeps have less filters and therefore tend to be more "pure" in their displayed personalities, if that makes sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] misk@piefed.social 4 points 9 months ago* I’m pretty sure golden retrievers were used to evoke certain emotions - they’re innocent (like every dog), lovable goofs. I’d like some people to develop filters because some use it as an excuse. See Musk and that type of aspies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] misk@piefed.social 3 points 9 months ago (2 children) I love humour so much that it pains me when it’s used to misinform. Maybe it’s an accumulated grudge because I see how some of my friends share memes that are very relatable but are insidiously misleading in a way that either strokes ego or benefits capital in some way. I genuinely think autistic people are „better” at things I care about but it doesn’t make them inherently ethical. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child) Hm, I'm not sure Golden Retrievers are inherently ethical either. I do think ASD peeps have less filters and therefore tend to be more "pure" in their displayed personalities, if that makes sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] misk@piefed.social 4 points 9 months ago* I’m pretty sure golden retrievers were used to evoke certain emotions - they’re innocent (like every dog), lovable goofs. I’d like some people to develop filters because some use it as an excuse. See Musk and that type of aspies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child) Hm, I'm not sure Golden Retrievers are inherently ethical either. I do think ASD peeps have less filters and therefore tend to be more "pure" in their displayed personalities, if that makes sense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] misk@piefed.social 4 points 9 months ago* I’m pretty sure golden retrievers were used to evoke certain emotions - they’re innocent (like every dog), lovable goofs. I’d like some people to develop filters because some use it as an excuse. See Musk and that type of aspies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] misk@piefed.social 4 points 9 months ago* I’m pretty sure golden retrievers were used to evoke certain emotions - they’re innocent (like every dog), lovable goofs. I’d like some people to develop filters because some use it as an excuse. See Musk and that type of aspies. permalink fedilink source parent