▲ 928 ▼ Wine 11 runs Windows apps in Linux and macOS better than ever (www.theregister.com) submitted 9 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world 187 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Ostuda@sh.itjust.works -3 points 9 months ago (4 children) Lulz, try running Affinity or DaVinci permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DillingerEscape@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago We've been running DaVinci for years https://github.com/zelikos/davincibox permalink fedilink source parent [–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (2 children) DaVinci works perfectly fine with the native version. Affinity works fine with wine as long as you can follow basic instruction, or can use the one-click launcher people made and maintain. (and I do mean one click, it's an AppImage, download and run it). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] taffroi@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) "Perfectly" is very optimistic about Davinci. It's often a hit or miss of people trying to install it, and when it works codecs are missing and there are some graphical & usability issues permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago If you can't get it to work with just the provided installer, you can look into this : https://github.com/zelikos/davincibox It works perfectly fine. The "missing codec" issues usually boils down to some commonly used codecs not being supported in the free version. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DillingerEscape@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago We've been running DaVinci for years https://github.com/zelikos/davincibox permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (2 children) DaVinci works perfectly fine with the native version. Affinity works fine with wine as long as you can follow basic instruction, or can use the one-click launcher people made and maintain. (and I do mean one click, it's an AppImage, download and run it). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] taffroi@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) "Perfectly" is very optimistic about Davinci. It's often a hit or miss of people trying to install it, and when it works codecs are missing and there are some graphical & usability issues permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago If you can't get it to work with just the provided installer, you can look into this : https://github.com/zelikos/davincibox It works perfectly fine. The "missing codec" issues usually boils down to some commonly used codecs not being supported in the free version. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] taffroi@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) "Perfectly" is very optimistic about Davinci. It's often a hit or miss of people trying to install it, and when it works codecs are missing and there are some graphical & usability issues permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago If you can't get it to work with just the provided installer, you can look into this : https://github.com/zelikos/davincibox It works perfectly fine. The "missing codec" issues usually boils down to some commonly used codecs not being supported in the free version. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago If you can't get it to work with just the provided installer, you can look into this : https://github.com/zelikos/davincibox It works perfectly fine. The "missing codec" issues usually boils down to some commonly used codecs not being supported in the free version. permalink fedilink source parent