▲ 76 ▼ Satanic Temple accuses Iowa officials of religious discrimination (www.nbcchicago.com) submitted 1 year ago by Deceptichum to c/usa@ponder.cat 7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] scott@lemmy.org -3 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] StupidOriginalName@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children) Are you sure you don't have TST confused with the church of satan? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReputedlyDeplorable@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago Yeah, the satanic temple is awesome. I love their t-shirts. I am not aware of anything “problematic” other than complaints by pearl clutchers because they have satan in their name. permalink fedilink source parent [–] scott@lemmy.org 4 points 1 year ago Ah. I must. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SanicHegehog@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago Iowa has always been problematic. Intense Orgasms With Animals permalink fedilink source parent [–] officermike@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) The Iowa officials? I agree. While this article makes no mention of what was approved for the 2024 holiday season for comparison, I was able to find that there was a rosary prayer event at the Iowa state capitol. Someone could have used the rosary beads to strangle, or used Catholic guilt to emotionally abuse children. Given the risk of danger to the children, that event should not have been approved. Now I assume you were talking about The Satanic Temple and not the Iowa officials. TST performs an important role in our society of reminding the community and the legislators that Christianity cannot be given preferential treatment by the government. They are a vital warden against the tendrils of theocracy. That is to say, for what they do to be perceived as problematic, there is a greater failing that needs to be addressed. If everything is working as it should, there are either no religious displays in government venues, or all religions are welcome. permalink fedilink source parent [–] corroded@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago By "these guys," you're referring to Christians, yes? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] StupidOriginalName@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children) Are you sure you don't have TST confused with the church of satan? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ReputedlyDeplorable@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago Yeah, the satanic temple is awesome. I love their t-shirts. I am not aware of anything “problematic” other than complaints by pearl clutchers because they have satan in their name. permalink fedilink source parent [–] scott@lemmy.org 4 points 1 year ago Ah. I must. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ReputedlyDeplorable@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago Yeah, the satanic temple is awesome. I love their t-shirts. I am not aware of anything “problematic” other than complaints by pearl clutchers because they have satan in their name. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SanicHegehog@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago Iowa has always been problematic. Intense Orgasms With Animals permalink fedilink source parent
[–] officermike@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) The Iowa officials? I agree. While this article makes no mention of what was approved for the 2024 holiday season for comparison, I was able to find that there was a rosary prayer event at the Iowa state capitol. Someone could have used the rosary beads to strangle, or used Catholic guilt to emotionally abuse children. Given the risk of danger to the children, that event should not have been approved. Now I assume you were talking about The Satanic Temple and not the Iowa officials. TST performs an important role in our society of reminding the community and the legislators that Christianity cannot be given preferential treatment by the government. They are a vital warden against the tendrils of theocracy. That is to say, for what they do to be perceived as problematic, there is a greater failing that needs to be addressed. If everything is working as it should, there are either no religious displays in government venues, or all religions are welcome. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] corroded@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago By "these guys," you're referring to Christians, yes? permalink fedilink source parent