The update will install much faster than 24H2.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'm losing track, but don't they usually go good, bad, good, bad?

98 good, m.e. bad, xp good, vista bad, 7 good, 8 bad, 10 good, 11 bad, so maybe 12 good?

Obviously I'm over simplifying and I skipped over 2000. But at least since 98 I feel like the trend has been pretty reliable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    2000 was marketed as business and server only, like NT before it. On the IT side of things, 2000 was rock solid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Consumers knew about 2000 because Me was such dogshit regular people started using 2000 despite the drawbacks.

    Most consumers didn’t know or care about Windows NT, or Windows 2003, 2008, and so on.

  • source
  • parent