you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

What about their handling didn't you like?

It sounded like they were put in a pretty crappy position by the upstream adding a grumpy warning message. It's also not like they were shipping a dangerous vulnerable old version or something, they backported security fixes into the stable version like with every other package, it just didn't have new features and improvements and the dev was sick of being asked by users to support the old versions.

Patching out the message (which was effectively PUP malware) on testing and then porting that to stable and shifting the default to LightDM and LightLocker in future releases seems like a good solution. I probably would have dropped xscreensaver altogether in future versions (which is what the author suggested) for being malicious, but at the time there weren't a lot of reliable alternatives and it was better for users to still have the option.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago*

    I think they should have either dropped the package or at the very least renamed it so people stop bothering jwz. Making the upstream developers deal with LTS versions they never intended to support is incredibly disrespectful.

  • source
  • parent