My favorite part is where they continue to argue with my banned ass, knowing full well I can't respond. The only way to win for them, I suppose.

Edit: Looks like there was some confusion regarding cross-posting in the original link so I'll just put the Modlog link here that displays the removed comment and ban, with the thread itself linked here. I'd rather add than change for the sake of the post's integrity and preventing confusion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

There's everything tankie about an .ml denying the genocide of the Uyghur. And no, I'm not going to platform them and give them a chance to say their shit. Like I said they have 3 whole comms to do that in, they can go do it there.

I'm gonna be real with you, I'm not even going to look at a MBFC link. It's a Zionist shitrag and I don't value their rating on anything as it's been shown to be biased time and time again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago*

    So...

    ML was a reason for banning them, but you only ban for authoritarian apologia and not because someone is from ML. Now you're saying they're a "tankie" because they denied the genocide, even though the facr of a Uyghur genocide is a contested topic regardless of political leanings.

    That's some round as hell looking logic. I don't think there was/is a genocide either and I have huge problems with the governments of China, Russia and DPK, including the treatment of the Uyghurs. We don't have to agree on terms ro agree some serious shit went down.

    Mediabias is quoted in published scientific journals and their fact checks are done by independent reviewers from the International Fact Checking Network.

    But I can't argue with someone who throws a label on everything they disagree with so they don't ever have to consider nuance.

  • source
  • parent