you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)

Why would I define human rights by virtue of what a wiki says today?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Ok... but you are aware that the UN have set actual Human Rights?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    Why on earth do you think not being listed in a particular document makes something not a human right

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Because it's factually not a Human Right?

    Your opinion of what you want them to be. Doesn't make it so.

    You have the right to a nationality. (Article 15) How you get one is up to each country. Most grant you one from either of your parents. Not the location you were born.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    I don't think you are the arbitrator of what a human right is..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Correct. I am most certainly not. That would be the UN.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    You are both pedantic and pathetic. Yes someone in danger of losing citizenship for speaking out politically and then sent to a gulag to die doesn't have a human right to continuity of citizenship under the law

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Article 15 doesn't give you the right to a specific nationality. It gives you the right to a, nationality. They can only take away your US Citizenship if you are also a citizen of another country.

    Otherwise you would involuntary be made stateless. And that would be a Human Rights violation.

  • source
  • parent