219
Ontario could ban declawing cats, debarking dogs under new regulations | CBC News (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/cat@lemmy.world
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

also ear cropping

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 28 points 10 months ago* (6 children)

plus ear clipping. Not like marking trap and releases, but "I want my doggo to have pointy ears!"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Ok, but let’s explicitly allow human ear clipping … so we can have pointy elf ears.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Sure the difference here is the ability to consent

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Then why is circumcision not allowed? Is it ecause they're mostly done to kids?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago*

    Pretty sure most people are only against circumcision for infants who do not consent. No one is talking about those with a medical need.

    I get surgically removed foreskins every day at my work, but they are elective procedures by those who can consent for a relatively "common" condition called phimosis.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    Oh, I would never get in the way of that! I think the cutoff should be when the entity getting their ears clipped can/can't give explicit consent.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent