86
How we get to 1 nanometer chips and beyond (research.ibm.com)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

can we please socially murder the sales/marketing team that rebranded the unit in nodes from something physically meaningful to a random countdown detached from reality? (1nm node does not have any bearing on critical dimension or size of the circuits)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    To be fair, the industry spent decades measuring a distance, so when they started doing features that had equivalent effects, the easiest way for people to understand was to say something akin to equivalent size.

    Of course, then we have things like Intel releasing their "10 nm* process, then after TSMC's 7nm process was doing well and Intel fab hit some bumps, they declared their 10 to be more like a 7 after all.. it's firmly all marketing number..

    Problem being no one is suggesting a more objective measure.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Eli12?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago*

    Open any wikipedia article about "x nm process" and one of the first paragraphs will be something like this:

    The term "2 nanometer", or alternatively "20 angstrom" (a term used by Intel), has no relation to any actual physical feature (such as gate length, metal pitch or gate pitch) of the transistors. According to the projections contained in the 2021 update of the International Roadmap for Devices and Systems published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), a "2.1 nm node range label" is expected to have a contacted gate pitch of 45 nanometers and a tightest metal pitch of 20 nanometers.[1]

    It used to be that the "60nm process" was called that because the transistor gate was 60nm.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent