you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

He's not immune because he shot a woman in her head for no reason, not related to his duties whatsoever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    He will still try to argue that, and prosecutors need to come up with real reasons why it doesn't apply. Defence lawyers are not stupid and they will probably think of a way to argue immunity. Those arguments must be anticipated, researched, and rebutted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)