579
Stack Overflow in freefall: 78 percent drop in number of questions (www.techzine.eu)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
128 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Boring standard coding is exactly where you can actually let the LLM write the code. Manual intervention and review is still required, but at least you can speed up the process.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    Code made up of severally parts with inconsistently styles of coding and design is going to FUCK YOU UP in the middle and long terms unless you never again have to touch that code.

    It's only faster if you're doing small enough projects that an LLM can generate the whole thing in one go (so, almost certainly, not working as professional at a level beyond junior) and it's something you will never have to maintain (i.e. prototyping).

    Using an LLM is like giving the work to a large group of junior developers were each time you give them work it's a random one that picks up the task and you can't actually teach them: even when it works, what you get is riddled with bad practices and design errors that are not even consistently the same between tasks so when you piece the software together it's from the very start the kind of spaghetti mess you see in a project with lots of years in production which has been maintained by lots of different people who didn't even try to follow each others coding style plus since you can't teach them stuff like coding standards or design for extendability, it will always be just as fucked up as day one.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    That is a bit ... overblown. If you establish an interface, to a degree you can just ignore how the AI does the implementation because it's all private, replaceable code. You're right that LLMs do best with limited scope, but you can constrain scope by only asking for implementation of a SOLID design. You can be picky about the details, but you can also say "look at this class and use a similar coding paradigm."

    It doesn't have to be pure chaos, but you're right that it does way better with one-off scripts than it does with enterprise-level code. Vibe coding is going to lead people to failure, but if you know what you're doing, you can guide it to produce good code. It's a tool. It increases efficiency a bit. But it also don't replace developers or development skills.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent