you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't think this hits as hard as you want it to. "Natural" arguments are going to hit on their face because, well, animals eat other animals, and if you're only not drinking an animal's milk because it's not natural, then are you okay eating one? No, obviously not. I like the arguments from a corporate farming standpoint that treats animals unethically, because it is factually true and morally justifiable from most, if not all, viewpoints. You should incorporate that in more, it's hard to defend against, but don't use "it's natural" because that is not a good argument.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Not to mention what looks like a contradiction.

    If it was only made because a cow was forced by humans to give birth, doesn't that mean it was made for humans?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    By this logic you could say you empty your bladder for the purpose of avoiding the embarrasment of urinating on yourself in public, rather than the biological purpose of excreting waste products.

  • source
  • parent