617
But birds in a giant blender is a more appealing headline (slrpnk.net)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/justpost@lemmy.world
112 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 2 points 10 months ago (6 children)

We, humanity, domesticated wild cats into pets and spread the throughout the world. "Feral" cats only exist as a result of "Domestic" cats.

That is not something you can equivocate, there is no separation, they are the same species, the feral population would not exist without the domesticated versions, like feral hogs.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

    That's not true. Cats domesticated themselves.

    domesticated wild cats into pets

    That's not what domestication means.

    If your point is that all feral cats are members of a domesticated species, then you are correct only by definition. If your point is that all feral cats come from pet cats, then you are factually incorrect.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    The relationship between cats and humans is the exact defenition of domestication. All feral cats come from humans moving non native cat species to areas around the world, cats are African. The words feral and domestic are linked. And yes, to answer your last question all feral cats are a result of domestic cats, the term feral only exists in relation to term. Feel free to hit me with sources on this. If they aren't feral they are wild.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feral_cat

    I've got another resource on domestication to.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestication_of_the_cat

    I'm not the one twisting language here.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

    I'm not the one twisting language here.

    Let's try not to take things personally here. I'm not twisting words, and I'm not claiming that you are either. I'm pretty confident the equivocation is an honest mistake.

    We don't disagree on the definition of a domesticated species here. We don't disagree about whether cats are domesticated or not. The original comment by gmtom said, "graph would be better if feral cats were separated from pet cats. As the vast majority of predation comes from those feral cats." Note that the categories we are discussing here are feral cats and pet cats, not feral cats and domestic cats.

    You respond by saying, "The reason they are the same group is that feral cats result from domestic cats, if there were not domestic cats, we would not have feral cats. They are not wild, native cats." The categories here have changed to feral cats and domestic cats when the original comment was about feral cats and pet cats.

    You can conclude from this line of reasoning that separating the graph into the categories of feral cats and domesticated cats is inappropriate, but you cannot use this line of reasoning to conclude that it is inappropriate to separate the graph into the categories of feral cats and pet cats.

    Using this argument to suggest that it is inappropriate to separate the graph into the categories of feral cats and pet cats is to equivocate two distinct usages of the term domestic. One usage means "a member of a domesticated species" and the other usage means "pet" or something like "non-feral domesticated." These are clearly distinct usages. In one case, the categories overlap, while they are mutually exclusive in the other.

    Feel free to hit me with sources on this. If they aren't feral they are wild.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feral_cat

    I've got another resource on domestication to.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestication_of_the_cat

    We don't disagree on the facts here, so no number of sources could resolve this discussion one way or another.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    I see what you're saying, I'm using domestic and pet interchangeably. That's because pets are domestic animals, the domestic cat is named that because it was domesticated. These words can all be used at the same time and are. Pets, domesticated cats, whose species common name is the domestic cat, are responsible for all feral populations in the US. There is no source for feral cats beyond the introduction of them by people. Which occurred through both pets and working animals in farms, shipping, etc.

    I'm arguing with the other user that the graph isn't actually saying anything about cats, it's talking about windmills and the fact that pet domestic cats are responsible for 1/3rd of the bird killings on that graph is meaningless because the feral population does not exist without the domestic pet population of domestic cats.

    The whole point of the graph is pointing out that no one gives a shit about how many birds cats kill, so why are we arguing about windmills using birds.

    I'm not sure if we still disagree.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Yes, sorry. I suppose I could have been more precise from the get-go. That's what I get for using social media at work. I understand the desire to see the data broken down further, but at the same time, it does make sense to me to keep pet cats and feral cats lumped together in the context of analyzing bird deaths associated with humans. I think we're in complete agreement with that sorted out.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •