you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 61 points 10 months ago (16 children)

Until the early 1900s, "mild" mental illness such as autism just didn't exist in a medical sense. People were "odd", "eccentric" etc and even after autism was formally recognised and studied in the 1940s it was virtually unheard of. Again, people were odd, a bit weird or eccentric.

There are no records of diagnosed cases of autism or similar before the 1900s because nobody recognised them for what they were.

Serious mental health issues have been recognised for thousands of years. Records of diagnoses of "lunacy" and "insanity" go back to the 1400s in the UK. Back then the cure was imprisonment in a cage and with regular blood letting and being plunged in cold water.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] 30 points 10 months ago (14 children)
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    autism isn't a mental illness. It's a difference in brain structure

    Define mental illness?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    This seems incredibly disingenuous when you can just go search the internet for the definition

    The F? That's what I did, and posted in the other comment. :⁠-⁠P

    I think there's a definition of "wrong" here as well. That's a very subjective definition. My god son has autism, and he has problems in school, and it makes life difficult for his parents and siblings. That's not "wrong"? It creates harm in some definition.

    I dunno, I'm not trying to blame autistic people or make them seem bad or worth less or something, I'm just saying that it sure feels like an illness sometimes. I also suspect I have some ultra mild placement on the spectrum, and it can be challenging in certain situations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago

    and you didn't respond to me, so if you hadn't said that I might not have seen it at all.

    But I did respond to you. The comment with the definitions from Wikipedia is a response to your comment.

    And you didn't bother to look before responding to me because...?

    Didn't bother, or didn't have time at the moment. 🤷‍♂️ Sometimes life happens. When I had time, I bothered, as you saw. 👍

    you want to act like I'm an asshole

    What? No, I don't. Why would I? 🤨

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    The definition and classification of mental disorders are key issues for researchers as well as service providers and those who may be diagnosed. For a mental state to be classified as a disorder, it generally needs to cause dysfunction.[15] Most international clinical documents use the term mental "disorder", while "illness" is also common. It has been noted that using the term "mental" (i.e., of the mind) is not necessarily meant to imply separateness from the brain or body.

    According to the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), published in 1994, a mental disorder is a psychological syndrome or pattern that is associated with distress (e.g., via a painful symptom), disability (impairment in one or more important areas of functioning), increased risk of death, or causes a significant loss of autonomy.

    In 2013, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) redefined mental disorders in the DSM-5 as "a syndrome characterized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological, biological, or developmental processes underlying mental functioning."

    I dunno, sounds to me like autism fits fine with "mental illness", possibly depending on the severity/placement on the spectrum. Note that mental illness isn't something easily defined. I just pulled the quotes above from Wikipedia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Being included in the DSM doesn't automatically classify something as a mental illness

    No, but those descriptions of a mental illness I thought fit autism fairly well. 🤷‍♂️ That's what I meant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    would you consider left-handedness a disability? just because someone struggles with things that suit the majority doesn't mean it's an illness

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Left-handedness doesn't need to be a struggle, does it? We don't force kids to write with their right hand anymore since many decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Speaking as a left-handed person it absolutely is a struggle, and given that the majority of the world is right-handed, for practical purposes it actually does need to be a struggle, otherwise ALL non-ambidextrous things would be a struggle for right-handed people instead, and that would be an even stupider way to run the world (as funny as it would be to see everybody else suddenly struggle with the things we struggle with on a daily basis, that's not a fair or sensible way to expect any civilization to function)

    The things that left-handed people struggle with are due to subtle design issues caused by things that require asymmetric designs, you won't notice an obvious problem with the asymmetry as a right-handed person, but they're real struggles. Things like the shape being uncomfortable is only part of it, with scissors for example, the strength is coming from the wrong side, it won't cut properly, for things like writing, our hands smear the ink as we go or have to be held hovering above leading to strain and poor penmanship, spines and bindings immediately get in our way the moment we start trying to write, many things don't fit the way they're supposed to, don't have the correct angles when used in the left hand, or often they will block our vision or put our hand in a place that blocks our vision, whereas a right-handed person's hand does not block their vision using the same tool. The issues are complex and subtle, but they're significant, and they are not necessarily solved by simply making things symmetrical or reversing them. As much as lefties might enjoy a language that is written right-to-left, it's not a practical solution to the reality that we are a minority where things are designed for the majority.

    Ironically the languages that DO write right-to-left, actually did not do it for the benefit of left-handed people, but did it to benefit right handed people, when they're chiseling into stone tablets as the hammer (in their left hand) would block their view. So if you want to know how it feels to be left-handed, go chisel some essays on a stone tablet. It'll make me feel better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    Back then the cure was imprisonment in a cage and with regular blood letting and being plunged in cold water.

    And by drilling holes in the skull. Plus probably various other horrible 'treatments' that just created extra problems without fixing the original (and very vaguely understood) issue.

  • source
  • parent