you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Eggs already existed here

Been saying that for ages.

But then [as the op points out] the question re-arises when asking "Which came first, the chicken or the chicken egg?" The first chicken would have been in an egg... do we call that egg a chicken egg? Is the egg defined by who laid it rather than what's in it?

  • If the latter [what's in it?], which forms first? The chicken, or the egg around it? The egg.
  • If the former [who laid it?], the chicken came before the chicken egg, that first chicken being in an egg named after whatever non-chicken laid it.

So which is the proper definition? I'm leaning to who laid it. The first chicken came out of a non-chicken egg. The chicken came first. And then went on to lay the first chicken egg.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    That depends on how you define chicken egg. The egg that hatched to a chicken predates the chicken which predates the egg laid by a chicken. The first egg from which a chicken hatched was from a bird almost but not quite a chicken and you'd probably be completely incapable of drawing a line at which generation it is and successfully defending that decision

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment