you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Counterpoint: tHe ShArEhOlDeRs SaY jUsT sHiP iT

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah ultimately CivEs get to withhold a signature and if they don't sign it's illegal to build. Software doesn't need a PE

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Is it that universal though? I know it was 40 years ago now, but when management overrode engineers to sign off on the disastrous launch of the Space Shuttle Challenger, I don't think they faced any legal consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I've always been uncomfortable, honestly, with calling software developers "engineers". Partly that's because it's actually illegal to call a non-PEng role an "engineer" in some jurisdictions (most of Canada), but I think this comment is an excellent point of distinction to make between PEng and other roles.

    Legal responsibility along with regulatory requirements. There's a reason everyone* trusts elevators and airplanes but shouldn't trust most software.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I don't know those guys so they can say what they want. We don't just ship. We code, review, test and only then deploy. I will build this the only way I can see and it'll take 3 days. Want me to start this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Too late. They already outsourced it to someone who promised to get it done in one day for half the price.

    Of course, it will take six months to fix all the problems it causes, but that is next quarter's problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment