you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 63 points 10 months ago* (8 children)

7-9:30a Definitely speaks to it being rush-hour specific.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    How can it be rush hour when it’s two and a half hours long?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    It covered Rush Hour and a portion of Rush Hour 2. Not 3, because the city is no fun.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Perhaps that's done in the afternoon but OOP didn't mention it because it wasn't relelvant?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Maybe it wasn't obvious, but I was referring to the runtime of the Javkie Chan movies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    No apparently my comment wasn't obvious enough. I was attempting to imply that the afternoon rush hour traffic may have a similar restriction, during which Rush Hour 2 could be finished and Rush Hour 3 shown, but OOP didn't include whether such a restriction existed in the afternoon, as they would not typically be traveling by the same route in the afternoon, hence no need to change a presumably separate sign indicating the hypothetical afternoon/evening restriction.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    Because the busy period in the morning and evening are more than 1 hour long about everywhere with people having differing work schedules that all begin and end within similar but not exact time frame.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments