Of the total area that is used by humans (Agriculture, Urban and Built-up Land),

  • urban and built-up land is 1m km²,
  • agriculture is 48m km²,

so agriculture is 48 of 49 millions km² used, that's 98%. The remaining 2% are all streets and housing and other infrastructure together.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 10 months ago (14 children)

There's a great deal more data available which also supports my conclusions, I encourage you to engage with the subject matter directly in light of that.

our exchanges, until now, have been solely on the subject matter. this aside belies an interest, on your part, in making the matter personal instead.

please, engage with the subject matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (13 children)

    Would you mind consolidating your replies? This is going to get confusing. Also, no, I had already criticized your behavior prior to that comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (11 children)

    instead of criticizing my style, try to stick with the subject matter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (10 children)

    It's like engaging with a bad-faith hydra - one of these is literally just a single word reply. If you can't even make your nonsense feasible to engage with why should I extend you the courtesy of treating you as anything other than the poor troll you're behaving like?

    You've misunderstood my initial claims and/or the data, which are both abundantly clear - and on top of that you've spent this whole time acting like a jerk. I'm not going to reward this behavior.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (9 children)

    this is just posturing and accusations. your evidence doesn't sufficiently support the claim you e made, and now you're making excuses not to present sufficient evidence. I strongly suspect you don't have it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (8 children)

    Lmfao I already provided evidence that 1:1 matches exactly what I said (because I based my initial claims off it), quit yer bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (7 children)

    saying it doesn't make it true

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (6 children)

    It doesn't make it false, either. That's the nice thing about truth, it doesn't care what you think about it, it's just self-evident. Good grief you're really not very good at this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (5 children)

    anyone can read what you claimed, evaluate the supposed evidence you provided, and see it does not support your claim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    Well no, they can read the evidence and then draw their own conclusions. I'm not so arrogant as to try and speak for them, a moral burden you appear delightfully unencumbered by.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    anyone who believes what you've presented supports your claim does not understand the claim or the evidence or both.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    So now you're not only trying to speak for them, you're implying they're stupid? Bold move there buddy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments