9
[Answered] Does Lemmy need a fork or a rewrite due to its maintainers views? (programming.dev)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
86 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I read an old thread documenting the opinions of Lemmy maintainers an the .ml instance. The issue of funding a project with people openly expressing opinions many find distasteful and it being the biggest reddit alternative on the fediverse came up, so here's a topic to discuss it.

What should we do? What are the options?

Answer: No fork necessary, there are Piefed and Mbin.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

What is the difference with Lemmy? What’s better and worse with Piefed?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    PieFed is newer so maybe missing a couple features with some clients, but in general is much better managed and more actively developed. It has some features above Lemmy already too. It will win in the end IMO.

    Here is ChatGPT's take on the differences:

    PieFed

    • Community topics & categories — lets admins organize communities into shareable broader topics.  
    • Feeds — user-created bundles of communities (like multireddits).  
    • Image-heavy gallery views for communities.  

    Lemmy

    • Traditional community per instance model without built-in topic categories (though users can simulate via tags/feeds).  

    🛠️ 

    Moderation & Safety Tools

    PieFed

    • Richer moderation toolkit — including stronger instance-level blocks, IP bans, and admin tools.  
    • Keyword filters and block instance content hiding.  
    • Emphasis on trust/safety tooling and reputation signals.  

    Lemmy

    • Standard moderation hierarchy (instance admins + community mods).  
    • Moderation tools are improving but generally less opinionated than PieFed’s “healthy community” features.  

    👤 

    User Experience & UI

    PieFed

    • Keyboard shortcuts, cleaner UI design (subjective).  
    • Private voting option: votes can be hidden from the federation.  
    • Comment collapsing at −10 score by default.  
    • Low reputation indicators for consistently downvoted users.  

    Lemmy

    • Mature, widely supported UI with more third-party apps and tools.  
    • Some features (like comment UI or search) are subject to continued refinement.  

    🔌 

    API & Ecosystem

    PieFed

    • API support is still maturing; some features in the web UI don’t yet have API endpoints.  
    • Some third-party clients are beginning to support PieFed but it’s not as broad yet.  

    Lemmy

    • Established API used by many clients, so almost all functionality is accessible to apps.  

    🚧 

    Maturity & Stability

    PieFed

    • Newer project, rapidly evolving, occasionally incomplete features or polish.  

    Lemmy

    • More mature with a larger community and more stable tooling thanks to years of development.  

    📌 

    Interoperability

    Both PieFed and Lemmy speak the same ActivityPub-based “threadiverse” protocol, meaning:

    • You can interact with communities from either platform regardless of which software you use.  
    • Posts, comments, up/downvotes, and interactions federate across instances and platforms.
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent