I hear these comments for not wanting to help people, and it feels like we're worshipping individuality to the detriment of community, which is necessary for survival.

  • "I don't want my money going to ___ ."
  • "This is not a democracy, it's a constitutional republic!"
  • "You don't have any freedoms under socialism/communism."
  • "They're just looking for a handout because they're lazy."
  • "I'm a self-made man. I didn't need anyone's help."
  • "Empathy is not a virtue."
  • "I don't see how that's my problem."
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

Some of that is dumbfuckism. Constitutional republics are democracies, for example.

Some of those sentiments have always existed & come across as though you were born yesterday.

While socialism is a broad term, communism usually refers to communist states, which are authoritarian regimes that even in theory reject universal individual rights/liberties. Non-authoritarian socialism is something else.

People have a duty to beneficence. However, plenty of people lazily toss empathy around as an argument from outrage fallacy instead of bothering to build a more credible & persuasive argument. Listeners get sick of that fast & don't mind if you think of them as monsters: they certainly don't care about your poorly argued opinions.

So, that could be deprogramming or it could be ineffective discussion breakdowns. I don't think empathy requires programming. I'd think its rejection require reprogramming.

Individualism doesn't necessarily mean selfishness. As pointed out elsewhere, collectivism can also lead to oppressive injustices.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I hate the the fact that if I tell my views to people, ML's automaticaly call me a conservative, and conservatives call me a stalin-supporter.

    That's what I get for having nuanced views lmao.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment