you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 76 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Plans move to Rust, with help from AI

As if AI could handle the mountains of checks Rust has you account for.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (4 children)

    While I agree that I don't think that an LLM is going to do the heavy lifting of making full use of Rust's type system, I assume that Rust has some way of overriding type-induced checks. If your goal is just to get to a mechanically-equivalent-to-C++ Rust version, rather than making full use of its type system to try to make the code as correct as possible, you could maybe do that. It could provide the benefit of a starting place to start using the type system to do additional checks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The safety designed into Rust is suddenly foreign to the C family that I'm honestly not sure you can do that. Even "unsafe" Rust doesn't completely switch off the enforced safety

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago*

    If they rely on UB at all, then this won't work. At best you get a compile time error, but more likely your rust program will do weird stuff with memory. And given how much people rely on compilers "acting nice" when it comes to aliasing (something rust does not fuck around with), I wouldn't hold my breathe

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I'm my experience, LLMs are especially bad at Rust. They really don't seem to grasp the borrow checker.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago*

    I used Rust with Deepseek for a small project for copying and pasting snippets and it went pretty well, but I wouldn't trust it to work with and debug a codebase on its own, especially not an OS

  • source
  • parent